Valuation Quick Viewer
A quick estimate of net social value
Change the sector or headcount and the societal value recalculates instantly. These are sector-average estimates — please sign in for a precise valuation.
Benchmark-based estimate. Refine it with actuals in the full valuation.
Run the full valuationNet societal value (annual)
+$1.5M
Natural capital
-$71.4K
Human capital
+$1.3M
Social capital
+$230.8K
Research & Methodology
Methodology
Impact Ledger is an impact accounting tool that converts business activities into societal value. Every calculation follows a single formula, with row-level evidence. Full methodology details are available after sign-in.
DBL Social Value
Stakeholder accounting — CSES · SK DBLFollows the Double Bottom Line (DBL) framework established by CSES (Center for Social value Enhancement Studies) and SK. It splits the social value a company leaves with stakeholders into three areas — indirect economic contribution, environment, and society — and sums each area's benefit minus cost. Indirect economic contribution recognizes employment, taxes, and dividends at face value; environment monetizes the harm from GHGs, air and water pollutants, waste, and water use with KRW value factors; society reflects labor, shared-growth, and community-contribution performance. It is computed in Korean won and mirrors the disclosure format of Korean sustainability reports (e.g. SK).
Data sources — DART filings + sustainability report
Two public data sources are combined by role. Indirect economic contribution (jobs, dividends, tax) is pulled as structured data from DART's audited annual filings, while environmental and social performance is extracted from the sustainability report (SR). DART figures are the company's own disclosed numbers, so they are more accurate than re-deriving from financial statements; each item's source (DART filing · SR extract · benchmark estimate) is shown in the report.
Monetized impact accounting
Converts a company's social and environmental impacts into monetary units and derives net social value as value created minus offset (harm). Every calculation shares one formula — output × outcome × additionality × value factor — and what differs between methodologies is the basis on which value factors are recognized. The six recognition bases below sit on the same mechanism and differ only in monetization factors — chiefly the carbon price and the value of health — so choose by measurement purpose and reference region.
Six recognition bases (value factors)
Global eQALY (reference-aligned)
Global — eQALY damage costs (Valuing Impact)Follows Valuing Impact's eQALY methodology. One eQALY = $62,082 (population-weighted OECD GDP per capita, PPP); climate uses country damage costs (~$165/tCO2e); income and taxes convert via country HUI/HUT factors for 217 countries.
Integrated impact accounting (IFVI-VBA)
North America + Europe — IFVI-VBA · IWAFCombines the latest public methodologies: IFVI/VBA social cost of carbon ($248/tCO2e for 2026 emissions), US HHS VQALY ($726,000) for health, IWAF face-value treatment (1:1) for taxes, community, and consumer surplus, and Green Book 3.5% discounting for multi-year outcomes. Adds gender pay-gap (IWA pay equity, 1.09 remediation factor) and PM2.5 air-pollution rows, with per-category sensitivity ranges (e.g. carbon 0.5-1.6x).
Wellbeing & co-benefit integration
Anglo-American scholarship — Bressler · HMT WELLBYBuilds on the integrated recognition basis with recent scholarship. Climate damage is priced at a mortality-inclusive $258/tCO2e (Bressler, Nature Communications 2021); the wellbeing that employment creates beyond wages is valued in WELLBY units (~$16,600 each) per the UK Treasury wellbeing guidance; and durable carbon removal is credited at the same carbon price (Frontier, Puro.earth). Rennert et al. (Nature 2022), $185/tCO2e, serves as the sensitivity floor.
Asia regulatory-aligned (KR·CN·JP)
Asia — KR·CN·JP compliance prices · SVIMonetizes climate at the compliance carbon prices Northeast Asian companies actually face: Korea K-ETS $6.60/tCO2e (2025 average), China national ETS $9.85/tCO2e, and the Japan GX-ETS price-band floor of $11.36/tCO2e — a simple average of about $9.3/tCO2e (verified via ICAP). Social performance follows Korea's Social Value Index (SVI, 14 indicators) and CSES-style measured monetization, with framework grounding in China's CASVI SV99 rating, the CASS CSR Blue Book, Japan's Yanagi Model (ESG–PBR synchronization, validated at Eisai), and SIIF's impact measurement & management. Health and safety keep the international-standard VQALY.
Europe target-consistent
Europe — HMT target-consistent · WELLBYMonetizes climate using the UK Treasury Green Book family of target-consistent carbon values: the official DESNZ guidance sets a central £264/tCO2e for 2026 emissions (about $338/t, ±50% sensitivity). Using marginal abatement cost toward net-zero targets — rather than damage cost — has been the official European (UK) appraisal approach since 2009. Employment wellbeing is included via WELLBY (~$16,600 each), taxes and surplus follow IWAF (NL) face value, and multi-year outcomes are discounted at the Green Book 3.5%. Institutional grounding: the Value Balancing Alliance (Frankfurt), co-author of the IFVI methodology.
North America damage cost (EPA SC-GHG)
North America — EPA SC-GHGMonetizes climate at the US EPA social cost of greenhouse gases: $190/tCO2e for 2020 emissions (2020 dollars, 2.0% near-term Ramsey; $120–$340 sensitivity) per the November 2023 report. After the 2025 federal-use halt, the 2023 report remains the latest official estimate and continues to be used in academic and state-level appraisal. Health is valued at the HHS standard VQALY ($726,000), and durable carbon removal is credited symmetrically at +$190/tCO2e on the strength of Frontier's advance-purchase market.
Index score
A non-monetary approach that, instead of monetizing, sums weighted indicator achievement into a 0-100 score and grade. Suited when a money unit is inappropriate or when scores and grades are the right way to communicate. The scoring method follows Korea's Social Value Index (SVI).
SVI method (adapted to app data)
Index score · Korea SVIBorrows the scoring mechanism of Korea's Social Value Index (SVI) — the five-tier achievement scale (S·A·B·C·D = 100·80·60·40·20%) and grade bands (Excellent 90+·Good 75+·Fair 60+·Weak 45+·Poor) — but restructures perspectives and indicators to fit the impact data this app actually measures (environment, social, economic). Support for official SVI certification is planned for the full service; each indicator is graded against sector and country benchmarks, and indicators without input are left unmeasured rather than guessed.
Official SVI structure
Index score - Social 60, Econ 30, Innovation 10Uses the official SVI's three perspectives, 14 indicators, and points as-is (Social 60, Economic 30, Innovation 10). Because SVI targets social-economy enterprises, only quantitative indicators measurable from general-company data are scored; qualitative ones (social mission, participatory decision-making, innovation) are left unmeasured. Quantitative thresholds use the app's benchmarks and may differ from the official SVI manual; support for official SVI certification planned for the full service.
B Impact 5 areas
Index score - 0-200 pts - certify at 80Uses the B Impact Assessment's five areas (Governance, Workers, Community, Environment, Customers) and the 0-200 scale with the 80-point certification bar as a frame. B Lab's official point allocation is dynamic by size, sector, and geography, so area weights here are the app's own even split; areas the app does not collect (product/customer, governance qualitative) are left unmeasured. Support for official B Corp certification is planned for the full service.
SROI ratio
Expresses the social value created relative to resources invested as a multiple (a ratio, e.g. 3:1). Suited when a return-on-investment view - rather than an absolute amount or score - is what you need. Follows the Social Value International standard.
Standard SROI
Ratio - Social Value InternationalSROI = present value of adjusted benefits / investment. This app monetizes benefits at global eQALY (Methodology 1) with row-level additionality (deadweight, attribution, persistence) already applied. The headline ratio divides annual net social value by annual resources deployed (payroll, community, training, supplier support, or a user-entered investment); the projected ratio is a reference assuming benefits persist five years, decline 15%/yr, discounted at 3.5%. Support for official SROI assurance is planned for the full service; indicative when the investment is a proxy.
Economic multiplier model
Estimates the ripple (indirect and induced effects) of a company's direct economic activity through the supply chain and spending on the regional and national economy, using input-output multipliers. Suited when you want the total economic footprint (output, jobs) rather than social value.
Standard Type II multipliers
Input-output - BEA RIMS II / IMPLANApplies Type II multipliers (direct + indirect + induced) to direct output (revenue) and jobs to estimate the total economic footprint. Total output = direct output x output multiplier; total jobs = direct jobs x employment multiplier. Grounded in US BEA RIMS II and IMPLAN; because multipliers vary by country, region, and year, representative sector values are used (e.g. manufacturing 2.1, services 1.6). A scale estimate; official input-output analysis is planned for the full service.
Official sources
Reference institutions and data
Every factor and formula is grounded in the public methodologies and data below. Each card links to the original source.
Europe
North America
Asia
Limitations
Results are benchmark-based estimates. They must not be used as-is for disclosure, audit, or investment decisions. Accurate measurement requires the company's primary activity data.